InHash – Eclipse plugin to compute hash and checksum
I just developed the eclipse version of the InHash plugin already developed for IntelliJ.
This plugin computes hash and checksum for files and selected text.
It started to be a necessity for a project where I was involved and “why not to create a plugin from it?”
Find it here: InHash – Eclipse plugin to compute hash and checksum
This question arises frequently.
There is no only markdown way to do it. We add a little html in the markdown.
| column1 | column2 |
| ------------: | :------------ |
| value column1 | value column2 |
| second value | <ul><li>list item 1</li><li>list item 2</li></ul> |
| another row | another row in second column |
At this end of year I would like to mix a little bit IT and some Christian teachings. It is not unusual, Donald Knuth on the book Things a Computer Scientist Rarely Talks About do an experience on the 3:16 versicle of the Bible.
Christian Bible talks about how God created the world using only His Words.
As humans, we use words too, of course, to talk, to transmit ideas and sometimes to change others behavior.
As IT People we develop programs with specific objectives that will run inside a computer.(or more)
If we create a metaphor and suppose we are like computers (in some way we are organic computers), we are somehow running code in our mind (in a different programming language in another paradigm). Code that can change itself or develop new code taking current statements. (Yes, this is possible now in several languages, like prolog, list, and even popular languages like C# where it is possible to “emit” code).
When we, as people, are talking to each other, we are “putting” code inside the other person, hoping it will change something inside him/her.
If she is a girl that we are trying to conquer, we create a program that will try to create a sense of good impression inside her, and try to hacker her in a way we touch the right place so she can start to be in love with us. There are books, tips, friends, all of it trying to teach us how to create a program like that.
A salesman tries to create programs to convince the others to accept his arguments, and buy his products. There are a lot of hacks about this, books, courses, seminars, etc., about hacking “persons” to force them to say yes!
Every day we are trying to hack the other person with our language.
Politicians are master hackers, with great programs, to hack several people at same time, with statements that can unify a group of people and push them to the same idea!
There are even NLP, the discipline that teaches to hack ourselves and hack the others! And, look to the name “Neuro-Linguistic Programming”
You got the picture!
Moral of this
One of the most important things a person should be careful is the tongue in our mouth because it is the keyboard that writes the program that will be inserted on the other person, and is capable of great and wonderful things and capable of really bad things, as we all know.
Every time you will be talking to someone, remember, you are inserting a program on the other person. Try to be constructive, something that brings value, and not something destructive, because there are people that have great security measures and knows how to defend from hacking, but others don’t, and this can be very destructive for their lives. Depressions, bad decisions, and others, very well know consequences of this.
“Likewise, the tongue is a small part of the body, but it makes great boasts. Consider what a great forest is set on fire by a small spark.” James 3:5
Have a great new year!
Office games is a thing in all jobs. All the time, intentionally or not, it is something being played. If you are in a game, and you don’t know the rules or even that you are playing it, you will loose it for sure.
The most important think in every office games it’s the leverage. Many people think its fairness, but it’s not. Life isn’t fair, maybe the “time” will make it fair in the long term, but for the job, most of the times it’s too late.
People aren’t on the job to be fair, they are for their personal reasons, money, success, satisfaction, recognition, power, etc. If you are an obstacle for them, they will defend their goals as they can, and usually not being fair.
The excellent Netflix series “House of Cards” is an example of managing “leverage”. There is a passage from Frank Underwood, the master of creating leverage when he is talking with the president:
“Do I think she oversteps sometimes? Yes. Does she wrongly equate her advice with mine? Often. But the question that occurs to me is not about Linda. Let’s say you refuse her resignation if this gets out, and it could, won’t you be sending a signal to anyone who works for you that you can be leveraged? “
So, learn the game, learn the rules, play it!
Here some tips to get leverage:
- Have something the other person needs
- Have more authority.
- Try to have a positive attitude
- Try to be “cold”. Don’t be too emotional.
- Have skills hard to be replaced
- Have a good reputation
- Try to have something that only you can provide
- Build a network of empathy and cooperative attitude with the others.
Yes, these are things we all know from working, but are we developing them as much as we are developing our hard skills?
One of the definitions of Leverage
“The ability to influence a system, or an environment, in a way that multiplies the outcome of one’s efforts without a corresponding increase in the consumption of resources.” (from the BusinessDictionary)
One of the most fascinating things to me are the paradoxes. Its something that’s true but its false, its something that’s right but it’s wrong, it’s something that it is not!
There are a lot all around us, and I will try to show some of them in future posts.
Lets see one very simple:
How many of you have already seen a page in a book with the sentence:
“This page was intentionally left blank”
This is a paradox! If the page was really blank there were no words in it. But the words are in it to say it, but they say the opposite. We understand it, but the meaning it is true and it is at the same time false.
The video below show the twin paradox. See if you understand it. (Clue: They are twins but…)
This video was taken from New Scientist